The prohibition on development approvals having inconsistent conditions is often misconstrued
November 21, 2019
SMSF and non-arm's length expenses in the legislative spotlight
November 19, 2019
Orb Holdings Pty Ltd v WCL (QLD) Albert Street Pty Ltd: The need to understand rights of access under an easement
Amenity in Rural and Urban Contexts - A Paper presented to QELA
The need for three-dimensional definitions
October 15, 2019
P&E Court Practice: The end of the scatter gun/the return of the town planner
Recent Court decisions highlight the necessity of coordinating your Estate Plan with the ongoing control of your SMSF and the payment of your death be...
Don't bite the hand that feeds you!
September 6, 2019
QELA Annual conference 2019 - Code assessment under the Planning Act
August 12, 2019
New cladding law for private building owners
October 23, 2018
Currency periods of approvals
September 5, 2017
Self-managed superannuation and the binding death benefit nomination - get it right or risk unintended outcomes
October 24, 2018
October 15, 2018
What’s the first thing some lawyers do when they receive a Statement of Claim? They ask for particulars. Even if they are already aware of the answers they purportedly seek.
Often, you’ll get a few bona fide requests nestled in amongst several dozen unnecessary, convoluted and objectionable requests.
If you don’t answer them, the Defendant might apply to the Court, which serves to delay the process even further.
EXPEDIATE does not allow parties to make requests for particulars in respect of claims under $100,000. For other claims, only the Arbitrator may seek particulars.
EXPEDIATE - there is a better way
Planning and Environment Court
binding death benefit nominations
commercial debt recovery
non-arm’s length income