LITIGATE vs EXPEDIATE: My dog ate my postman (and other popular excuses)

October 29, 2018

As a litigator for more than twenty years, I have heard every excuse in the book for failing to comply with deadlines.

 

The problem is: if another party fails to meet a deadline, there is no penalty, unless you ask the Court to intervene.  This costs time and money.  And, you will most likely get an order that gives the other party more time, anyway.

 

The Court should order that the other party pay your costs, but:

  • They will usually be a proportion of your total legal costs; and

  • You will most likely be unable to enforce the costs order until after the dispute has been finalised.

 

 

With EXPEDIATE:

 

  • The deadlines are mostly immutable (subject to some very narrow and tightly controlled exceptions).

  • If the other party fails to comply with a deadline, there are no excuses and no extensions.

  • If any party makes a misconceived application to the Court or Arbitrator, costs orders are for indemnity costs, payable immediately and without set off.

  • There are no more expensive and time-consuming applications or long delays while you wait for the other party to comply.

 

Click here for more information about the EXPEDIATE Rapid Arbitration System

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Featured Posts

Covid-19 Risk Audit: Could your business trade if you were struck down with the coronavirus?

March 26, 2020

1/10
Please reload

Recent Posts

October 15, 2019

Please reload

Archive
Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

QUICK LINKS

CONTACT US

Level 24/12 Creek St Brisbane Qld
GPO Box 7112 Brisbane Qld 4000

FOLLOW US

  • LinkedIn - Black Circle
  • Black Facebook Icon
  • Black Twitter Icon
  • Black Instagram Icon

Privacy Policy | Sitemap
© 2018 by Anderssen Lawyers Pty Ltd ABN 37 149 372 421

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.